Biometrics such as fingerprint recognition, retina recognition, voiceprint seem like appealing alternatives to the time-tested password. But one big drawback--if biometric data is compromised, as Slate says, "You Can't Change Your Fingerprints".
But is voice different? Because a voiceprint is inherently sort of like a two-factor approach: a thing you know (your passphrase) and a thing you have (your voice). If your voiceprint is compromised, then you can just use your same voice, with a new passphrase, to create a new voiceprint. Like creating a new password.
This website seems to support my reasoning.
(Obviously no security technology is perfect. Speaking out loud has privacy implications that swiping a finger does not. Supposedly impersonation or pre-recording is not a problem, though.)
(Obviously no security technology is perfect. Speaking out loud has privacy implications that swiping a finger does not. Supposedly impersonation or pre-recording is not a problem, though.)
giants vs vikings live stream
ReplyDeletegiants vs vikings live
vikings vs giants live stream
vikings vs giants live
nfl game pass
NFL GamePass
nfl game pass
NFL GamePass
nfl game pass
NFL GamePass
nfl game pass
NFL GamePass
nfl game pass
NFL GamePass
nfl game pass
NCAAF Live
College Football Live
College Football Live Stream
ESPN NCAAF
NCAAF FREE Stream
Live NCAAF
NCAAF Live
College Football Live
College Football Live Stream
ESPN NCAAF
NCAAF FREE Stream
Live NCAAF