I do not understand why Points per Attempt is not the key offensive basketball statistic, rather than Field Goal Percentage. First of all, it would correct for the major distortion of under-weighting the increasingly important 3-point field goal. Second, it would fine-tune for players who are good at both drawing fouls, and sinking free throws.
Showing posts with label innumeracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innumeracy. Show all posts
Sunday, June 01, 2014
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Liberal best intentions?
This article on NYC's findings on which buildings use the most energy seems rife with erroneous conclusions based on gross statistical over-simplification. Sounds like they must be using the most simplistic measurements of energy per square foot or energy per head count.
I view this as an example of (presumably) liberal good intentions, not anchored in solid science, that are likely to lead to waste, disillusionment and cynicism. Deeply flawed data is much more harmful than no data. #Innumeracy
I view this as an example of (presumably) liberal good intentions, not anchored in solid science, that are likely to lead to waste, disillusionment and cynicism. Deeply flawed data is much more harmful than no data. #Innumeracy
Friday, December 21, 2007
Innumeracy Watch: Dumb to Focus on Sports Contract Totals
I think it is so dumb when a newspaper article will talk about so-and-so-jock's $48 million dollar contract. Hello, people, we need a little context. Is that $48 million for one year? For 6 years? It does make a difference.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)